Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-28460949-20180205163230/@comment-24947676-20180206085051

CrabbyMeal wrote: SirVicksALot wrote: Oppose. The categories exist to categorise OCs by their sexuality and they're actually used. Also, it says on the Quality Standards that they are not mandatory, meaning that it's one's choice to add them or leave them out, so someone could just not add those is they did not want to.

Also, I would recommend changing "Romantic Preferences" to "Romantic Orientations" or "Romanticisms" since romanticisms are not preferences; because just like sexualities, they are orientations and not just preferences.

However, people widely used sign categories, too. And what happened to them? Yeah, they got deleted since they were never truly needed. ​​​

Also, I'll get the name changed since I never knew the proper English definition, since, like, the form I used is actually the proper one to use in Russian and I thought it applies in English, too. My bad. actually astrological sign categories were automatically added if you used a certain infobox template that was really popular. so nobody actually genuinely manually added them, they were just kinda there. same goes for the orientation categories, i think.