Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-28928032-20170423014606/@comment-27541663-20170423044754

Mr.Rankings11 wrote: CrystaltheCool wrote:

Mr.Rankings11 wrote:

CrystaltheCool wrote:

Mr.Rankings11 wrote:

CrystaltheCool wrote: Oppose, same reason as Porcy. Did you even read Porcy's comment? Did YOU evben read my response to his comment? Yeah, and it's clear that you merely skimmed through Porcy's comment, you buffoon.

Porcy said "Admins can't make rules willy-nilly, suggestions need to be made to add new rules."

You responded with "actually they CAN add rules without doing that", which is blatantly false, proving you to be an idiot who can't read. I'm paraphrasing in this case, but that's what your response seemed to be trying to say. Is there ANYTHING stopping them dfrom clicking the suggestion thread link and making a suggestion? No, there isn't. Indeed - there's nothing stopping them from making a suggestion.

However, you implied that there was a way for them to get around that, which is false. Your poor wording is most likely the reason everyone is opposing.

Y'see, this is why suggestions made by non-native English speakers never pass - it's a difficult language to learn, and you're guaranteed to crate an incomprehensible mess when you don't have a perfect grasp of the language. It's disappointing, but true. How cxan yiu be so srupid, BITCH, ENGLISH IS MY NATIVE LANGUAGE, AND YOU CAN BET YO ASS I'M PROUD OF IT! Can you like

Not cause fucking drama?