Board Thread:Apply For Staff/@comment-25714190-20160906201925/@comment-27831165-20160906221631

Swedechef wrote: XxMeowzersxX wrote: Dradoner1690 wrote: XxMeowzersxX wrote: Dradoner1690 wrote: XxMeowzersxX wrote: actually oppose because I have no memory of you ever being on this wiki (i have a bad brain lmao) I've been here for a few months. That is not bribing and/or persuading me to support, or even neutral. I was just stating a fact. Hmm, now lets see.

You joined less than a month after me, as of writing this you have 203 edits.

I joined less than a month before you, as of writing this I have 1,795 edits.

We wouldn't agree to put someone who barely edits on staff, now would we?

I mean I have like 600 edits in 9 months and I am a mini admin, so really just because they dont have ALL THE EDITS does not make them less viable/

Ill support you bubby. As I have said on a previous application, there is zero sense in putting someone on staff when they barely edit, because it would basically be an abuse of power. It also makes people who do that look power hungry, so... :/