Board Thread:Apply For Staff/@comment-32346540-20170924211009/@comment-32346540-20170924222951

Flutterbutter wrote: I'm going to oppose for the following reasons:

1) Your grammar is horrendous. You're not only misspelling simple words such as "which" (wich) and being (beeing) but you're also butchering sentences, saying things like, "beeing daily active". Correct me if I'm wrong but aren't rollbacks supposed to be people who help edit/correct pages (among other things)? Aren't they supposed to have good grammar, or at least passable grammar? I know for a fact content moderators need this skill and you do say you're planning on trying to become one so w/e.

2) I feel you're misinterpreting what staff do. Staff are regular users and their agendas aren't prioritzed. If you feel like using your position to try to boost your popularity and votes, I don't think I'd feel comfortable putting you into any staff position, even if it's a lower one.

3) You're obviously not equipped to handle tense or high risk situations (something staff do have to do) as per your "I used the same email as my first hacked account and that one got hacked too." As I said, I'm not fluent because English isn't my first language, and as I can see, you could understand me at least. These were (as I said in the post) minor errors and it didn And I made that mistake once (The hacked email), it doesn't mean I will make it numerous times. I touched that mater because I want the wiki to have less trolls and people who just spam others because I want a better wiki to everyone. I also am not using this to have popularity, I am making this to help the wiki.
 * The reason I bring up #2 is because under their, "But what are you going to do as a rollback?" they talk about pushing/trying to push some new rules into place.