Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-5226524-20160701151343/@comment-8846246-20160701192406

Igor the Mii wrote: 1.And? These things are very easy to find and there's no point on trying to remove them.

2.Not for the case for some users here.

3.It should have been like it was the old way, an application goes for 1 week before finishing.

4.It was a hypocrisy act.

5.You banned him for "violating dev's privacy" because he posted something that was supposed to be "private", but it's now public.

6.1 Year still was too much.

7.Doesn't that show you're trying to hide Dev's negativity? 1. Like I've said before. This wiki needs to respect his privacy.

2. What? I honestly don't know what you said.

3. The "old" (which I use very loosely as it never changed) way is flawed by the fact you could have 10 friends support you and never get the community's input.

4. How? If you say both things at the same time it CANNOT be hypocritical.

5. He had been warned before, yet he continued to break the rules. A push over admin who gives meaningless warnings is not a good admin. I'm an admin who will hold the rules to those who break them.

6. I never banned Xenpai for a year. I banned him from chat only for all of 2 hours.

7. No, it shows I'm helping him keep his privacy and enforcing our rules. People are free to talk about him anyway they like elsewhere. And they are free to critique/hate him here. But bringing up private info here is against the rules.