Board Thread:Apply For Staff/@comment-27349558-20160606212559/@comment-9026519-20160611214139

PISTACHIOLORD wrote:

Flutterbutter wrote:

Igor the Mii wrote: Flutterbutter wrote: Oppose. Rollback is considered a stepping stone for the other positions and I feel you'd take this step and begin to ban others out of personal opinions and your own set of rules. I was gonna yell "BUT ROLLBACK CAN'T DO SHIT BESIDES INSTANTLY UNDO EDITS" but i see your point I'm simply trying to stop the problem before it arises. :^)

Excuse me FlutterButter.But have you met KoolKoopa!She complements all the peoples ocs.(most of them) She is always nice on the wikia.She makes roleplays that makes groups of people to get togther.SHE DOESNT YELL I AM SATAN OVER THE WIKI CHAT.(hahaha.Wait thats me) She doesn't choose sides in debates and always try to end them.Im guessing you haven't met her.If i were you i wouldnt just straight out say oppose cause i think this. You know, there are other people who have done a shitty job as staff members who were "nice". The second they were demoted (if they ever were), a huge fuss was made because they had a group of supporters who thought they were "nice". Like I said, I'm trying to stop the problem I see before it arises.

Sure, Kool may be "nice" in your opinion, but there is a limit to how "nice" one can be w/o becoming a hypocrite while in power. Thisforum shows Kool has definitely crossed that boundary.

That forum also shows she has no idea what the actual rules on this wiki are w/ lines such as "(NOTE: If you oppose, DON'T make the reason 'Those people are too soft.' If you do, it will not count.)" and therefore, I don't believe she is fit to be enforcing any of them (the rules) because I feel, as previously mentioned, she'd end up making her own partly due to her lack of knowledge on the actual rules combined w/ her sense of justice.

This sense of justice can be easily seen in her post on, again, the same forum, in which she states, "Here's the thing. You guys have the right to dislike this post, but not the right to insult it, me, or any supporters." The problem with this, is she basically said "Yeah, everyone who is opposing this forum is bullying people by arguing w/ those who support it (which is what they're supposed to be doing) and is therefore being a bully". It's a sense of justice like that one that ends up leaving innocent people banned for "breaking the rules" because of biased opinions (especially since the supporters were arguing just as much).

That line also shows that, when she's losing, instead of admitting she was wrong or accepting it, she begins to push the blame onto others. This is another trait I try to avoid when voting for staff members simply because it makes them feel like they're even better than everyone else.

Finally, when electing a staff member, you can't simply look at one personality trait. If everyone was made up of one trait, we wouldn't truly be "people". Besides that, you still can't look @ just one personality trait. Everyone here has a track record and different views and I believe those are what need to be looked at most, alongside their understanding of the rules- departments Kool seems to lack.

Becuase of these reasons, I believe my opposition to her application is justified.