Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-24947676-20160924035628

Recently, people have started talking about the possibility of making what I like to call a "Counter-Suggestion" to a suggestion that has passed. Basically, if a suggestion to ban something passes, someone could make a suggestion to unban the something.

However, one could easily abuse this and make a counter-suggestion mere days after a suggestion has already passed! This is not okay.

So, there should be a cool-down period before making a counter-suggestion to a suggestion that has passed.

Since logically, counter-suggestions would only be made to major suggestions (or controversial suggestions), the cool-down period should be at least one month (two or three months maximum), so that one can see the effect that the result of the suggestion had, and then make a counter-suggestion with at least the minimum insight that was taken from the cool-down period. This would logically allow for, well, better counter-suggestions.

Whether you support or oppose, feel free to state your reasons why! 