Board Thread:Appeal Board/@comment-24947676-20170704043420/@comment-27541663-20170704050115

CrystaltheCool wrote:

Bluecats wrote: I'd like to oppose. Red ignores people because of how they make him uncomfortable. What good would demoting red do, anyways? Even if he's a "bad staff member", he became staff AFTER the wiki was already in a bad place. I'm sorry, but I don't understand the last sentence... What exactly do you mean by "demoting red wont do any good because he was promoted after the wiki was in a bad place"??

Breaking it down, it sounds like you're saying that demoting Red won't do any good even if he's a bad staff member because he was promoted after the wiki got out of a bad spot?? But that doesn't make any sense, since bad staff can derail the wiki from a good position to a really shitty one.

If you can simplify what you're saying, that would be great. Thank you for your thoughts and cooperation! I never said "Demoting red wont do any good because he was promoted after the wiki was in a bad place". I said that it wouldnt help to demote red. And I said red became staff WHEN the wiki was in a bad spot, and yet you seem to be making him out to be way worse than he is.