Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-5790218-20160211203109/@comment-5790218-20160211222632

I won't never take someone offending my writing as "poking" or "fun". I really try hard to keep it the best and I'm really bothered by this.

You proposed to be a Head Admin, it doesn't matter if you don't call yourself this, it's you title anyway and it was all your idea. One single user can't be a bureaucrat as this is a shared role used to the best members of the wiki who really need that hole.

It. Don't. Work. Like. A. Council. Read what the council does in the thread and please compare it to the current democracy, it is a different method. And, if they don't take action outside of chat, that's not a council in any way.

"We enforce the rules on them" you say. "They are punished" you say. That's not the true, most of the rule breakers here just go away with they mistakes, the admins and staff don't enforce authority they way they should do. There's almost no tutorials here, only a small guide who don't explain almost anything basic, they aren't detailed and it's ridiculous to force users to do them at this is a task given to the staff.

We have many problems that persist since the old fanon. Joke OCs are just a example, can't you see all the Wiki Drama? Or the Corrupt Staff dilemma? Sorry, this wiki is almost unchanged from the old fanon and you're not changing my mind, the council is a good idea and it will persist until the end, if it loses, so bad. But if it win it will really help the wiki to grow. I ain't fighting with you, I just want to make the wiki better and I don't think the way it is now is good. Sorry for that.