Board Thread:Apply For Staff/@comment-26849106-20160716061910/@comment-9026519-20160716080739

1- There is not "fixing this mess" since there really isn't a mess. Just a mass migration to another site. Overall, the community itself needs to come together to fix this mess. I don't feel making you a staff member will.

I also haven't opened any demotion forums up just yet, because, as previously mentioned, the staff does need to work w/ the community and I'm waiting to see, as everything wraps up, if any more staff revoke their positions, thus balancing things out. I don't think demotions should be opened for at least another few days when we can fully confirm who has and hasn't left.

2- If we're talking about the same thing (the kicking joke) I remember asking you to stop, therefore, if it wasn't an abuse of power, then it was harassment. Also, I know several people have come forward and mentioned this, and though no screenshots have been shown, I'm sure that w/ the amount of people saying it, it should be taken into consideration.

3- Let me put it this way Len. "abit of harassing" is and understatement as most staff members have done "a bit" regardless of what they say. The amount of harassing you did was enough for the community to come together and demote you from the position of admin, the highest position on the staff board, for it.

"'Now I feel like promoting you to mini-admin would be like promoting igor to mini-admin.' suppose to mean?" You and igor were both disliked and did work together when it came to applying for content mod. You were also both demoted for similar things. Therefore, I feel like promoting you to such a high position would be similar to promoting igor.

I'd also like to point out that your track record about harassing people points towards you actually doing it and there are people who are just as fit for this position as you are but have a cleaner track record. Something I'm willing to take into consideration.

4- Yes, everyone here is biased though I feel you're more biased than others. In your previous term, when an argument would break out, you would, more often than not, choose a side and defend that one side instead of being a third party who was trying to break the fight up - you added fuel to the fire and, even if everyone is baised, that's not something most of our staff members do.

5- "And come on, I'm not victimizing myself, you, yourself made a whole thread about this, I'm not playing the victim." I have already stated that, as of recently, you haven't been playing the victim because you are. However, this doesn't exclude the fact that you have argued and you have victimized yourself. Before you ask for proof, here's just one example. I pointed out a fact as a comment to an argument between you and other users, taking no side in the matter and you called it an attack. Sorry for bad quality. I don't have many images of the argument itself, but if you'd like to see what I do have, I can post that too as they were clearly going back and forth.

''"See 3. I joked with you and you said it was a harassment and abuse of power." ''I defended you for this Len. A joke that has gone to far becomes harassment, just like the jokes the users were playing on you, which I called out in my forum. The second someone asks you to stop it becomes harassment and I do remember asking you to stop.

"I was just having fun with you like what Legend does." If I remember correctly, you've tried to get Legend demoted and banned several times for such jokes. Hell, the one time you're referring to you went to extreme lengths to try to get him demoted for and became very upset and troubled when it got no where. I don't see why you should be able to use it now as defense.

"You are playing the victim in your number two though, sorry, but I wasn't abusing my powers." I don't think I'm really victimizing myself since I'm just using it as an example. But that's for you to decide.

6- "I've seen a point where everyone here hates me" As a mini-admin, you need to be able to work w/ people and for them to feel comfortable coming to you for help, I feel they need to like you. Something like this happening is not "people liking you" and therefore I don't feel you should be in such a high position.

"I'm one of the most helpful people on this wiki." I feel helpfulness can only go as far as the people who are willing to work w/ you.

"I feel like I won't let my short temper get the better of me" You feeling like your temper won't get the best of me is a speculation and I'm not willing to risk another large demotion taking place, which woud only put this wiki into a more dire state, over a speculation over someone who has already failed multiple times at controlling his temper. Tell me what's different now.

"Some people might not want to work with me bacuse you feel we're disagree on things, but do you know the state the wiki is in?" I do see the state this wiki is in and I'd like to help it just as much as the you. However, you 1) don't need the power to help it and 2) are, in my opinion a reason the wiki fell into such a state as things began to escalate after your first demotion. Besides, looking @ things like the blogs about not leaving and how people are acting, I feel everyone here wants to help this wiki. However, I don't see many people running for staff.

"I'll be willing to work with everyone to the best of my ability." The problem isn't necessarily if you're willing to work with them, it's if they're willing to work with you. Something I feel, as many don't like you, won't be easy for them to do without going out of their comfort zone.

7- In some sense it is and in some sense it isn't. However, as I have said before on many different forums, there are people who are more qualified than you are when it comes to being in this position.

8- This is just a personal opinion, but some of your morals irk me. Such as how you've acted on chat, being excessively "perverted" if you will in main.