Board Thread:Apply For Staff/@comment-9026519-20160424023728/@comment-9026519-20160424063949

Jackboog21 wrote: The reason I said "it didn't pass" is because I didn't know it wasn't highlighted until days after the creation. I only noticed because I went to look at the history after you posted that picture. And again, I do take responsibility for that. If I had noticed on that day, I would of (and should of) highlighted it.

And when I wrote the rule for running a week, I had run set as a synonym for highlight. So instead of "A vote should be highlighted for a week before it's tallied.", I wrote "A vote should run for a week."

And any threads I've closed without reason before a week was over, I didn't probably know were under a week old.

So you didn't notice something that was highlighted but managed to see the tally taken @ the end and then still add up the extra vote? Also, you say, "And again, I do take responsibility for that. If I had noticed on that day, I would of highlighted it," on pretty much every forum that closes because it wasn't highlighted. Should we not highlight those instead of close them? Also, the rules should have been more clear on that then. I feel you're using this fact to your advantage. If you had wanted it to be synonymous, then the rules should have said so (which they do not). They simply say it has to run (which I take as be posted) for seven days (as then a forum could run for a max of 13-14 days, if I had it highlighted on the very last day of it's run).