Thread:Xenpai/@comment-26834200-20151008200712/@comment-27974477-20151009002436

Sorry for late reply, I,ve got to go on that time.

"The logic behind that is that "males" and "females" are the only categories that we need. I don't know if Horizon told you, but gendered categories do not need to be mixed with those that describe age, career, etc. It leads to many possibilities."

As you said here the males and females are the only categories you need. also as in the message,"we would only use the following categories: "males", "females", "students", "teachers", "canon characters", and "OCs", If the wiki decided that those are the only cates that should be used, Why didn't an admin make a thread to tell all users about that sudden decision you just mentioned now?

___________________________

"The categories you are using mixes these bags. You take one marble from the "gender" bag and one marble from the "status" bag. This doesn't add category possibilties; It multiplies them. But the categories you form* out of each two marbles are too much. They only restate information over and over again, so much that it can be considered spam. Extra clarification is nice; It adds detail to the wiki."


 * I said before that I am NOT who made the categories,nor know who made it.I just found them here and added them to categories as they were not removed nor the sudden decision you made above was there.

____________________________

OK then, If you mean me just to use those 6 categories, I will.