Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-28172979-20161227072531/@comment-9026519-20161227160228

I think I'm going to oppose.

Though Jac doesn't show it, I do know he checks and cares for this wiki dearly. He's aslo had a lot of experience as an admin and not a lot of problems happen on this site off of the chat and as an admin his main priority isn't the chat, so I wouldn't in any way call him inactive or say he doesn't solve problems since not many of the problems are his concern. We have plenty of other moderators like myself who govern the chat. Jac only comes on when it's absolutely needed.

The next point I'd like to make is that Jac is actually probably one of the less biased staff members. We're all pretty biased and I feel the making of this forum was biased as there are other more biased and less active staff members.

I can't deny that there are occasions that Jac needs to be told several times to do something, but, if it causes such a problem, why not ask another admin to do it for you?

Now, I've countered the arguments provided but let me also give some information on Jac himself.

Jac has been an admin on this wiki for a very long time. I think he might actually be our oldest staff member by a long run. The guy has more experience than everyone here in my book (in regards to staff) and honestly, he handles problems a lot better than a good majority of our staff.

Jac has the ability to stay clam in situations and he can read them quite well; a skill many of our gung-ho staff members don't have, for better or for worse. This also allows Jac to, in my personal opinion from experience, be less biased than most. He can analyze a situation far better than most because he remains calm.

I also feel I should oppose because of the level of maturity those who posted this have shown. This forum became a clusterfuck of unrelated things very quickly after it was posted by the same people who wrote it and, to me, that shows a level of immaturity that I just don't believe should be taken seriously. I also find it unjust to try to demote an admin with such little evidence and so few reasons.