Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-28928032-20170407032035/@comment-27541663-20170407232233

Mr.Rankings11 wrote: SirVicksALot wrote: Strongly oppose. Firstly, the neutral option is actually a good thing because sometimes when a user votes neutral, they state how they could go either way with a suggestion. Secondly, a user whose vote is subject to change likely votes neutral and later switches to support/oppose for whatever reasons other users have supported/opposed for. Lastly, this suggestion is one of the worst written suggestions I've ever seen. I hear from the replies that there was no QualVote since I was likely sleeping or doing other things at the time this suggestion thread opened and the fact that it's only one or two poorly written sentences just makes me oppose even stronger. I can see why your first point makes sense however, your secound point makes no sense at all. If someone hasn't fully decided witch one thell pick, THEN SHOULD AIT ENTELL THEY DO, but instead they take up space by putting "Neutral", however I will edit my post to accommodate the first option. How is neutral a waste of space? They can change their vote from support/oppose to neutral.