Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-5226524-20160701151343/@comment-5226524-20160701195213

Jackboog21 wrote: 1. Deleting things that violate his privacy is not bad. Take it elsewhere if you want to share those.

2. Okay, I think I get it. You should of used "In the case for". Just saying what tripped me up.

Anyway, That's only about a 10% chance. Leading reasons I don't respond: 1. I'm in the bathroom. 2. I'm giving my great-grandmother food and/or her medicine. 3. Chat glitched and didn't give me the sound.

3. How does that relate? Say User394 had 10 friends who all qualified to vote. He creates a thread and has all 10 support him. No-one knows the vote happened except the 11 involved. He then gets promoted all because the community had no input.

4. You saying something is hypocritical doesn't make it hypocritical.

5. He breaks the rules he pays the price. If someone was giving out info on you that you didn't want public, would you say stopping them is censoring them? I'm willing to be you'd want them punished.

6. That was actually a mistake. I blocked him when I had just gotten my computer back so I was rushing through things and clicked the wrong thing. I fixed it though, he was only supposed to be blocked for 2 weeks.

7. They have the ability to use that blog, but linking to it here is against the rules. 1.These "private" things aren't private anymore, jack, they're PUBLIC, accept it.

2.Good.

3.You have a point there, but i still the old version back.

4.It is Hypocritical.

5.you're still censoring him.

6.True.

7.I'm going to link it anyway. http://stop-yanderedev.tumblr.com/ Go ahead, give me a warning for "Privacy invasion", i don't care.