Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-9026519-20160218070127/@comment-9026519-20160218224545

Flutterbutter wrote: Jackboog21 wrote: If warnings lose effect after 3 days then someone can simply wait then do whatever they did again. Warnings should last at least a month. Then I feel users should recieve at least 2 warnings before a ban within a 1 month period. They may break a rule and then break a different one that falls under the same position within that time, though not directly warned for doing it, thus recieving a ban. I've actually made a compromise. If a user is warned repeatedly for the same exact offense, they can be banned.