Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-9026519-20160425025523/@comment-9026519-20160425033412

Jackboog21 wrote: This doesn't need highlighted and I've said the reason I put them as synonymous. The run starts when it's highlighted. That's the way it was phrased. The re-phrase makes it more specific people clearly it needs to be. A vote needs to run (with a highlight) for a week. As for any times I've closed threads that didn't run highlighted for a week, I usually provide a reason. Reasons like "it's been 3 weeks and no admin noticed this, please make a new forum."

1) Most of the ones I've seen were closed after one week. If you want an example, I can find quite a few.

2) If you had noticed before, why did you not highlight them?

3) You said you found them synoymous. I don't think most others did (especially when we look @ past forums closed w/o being highlighted).

4) The rules stated, to you, forums could only be closed after being highlighted for a week. If you had intended to close them after a certain amount of time if they weren't highlighted, you should have said so.

5) I asked for this to be highlighted because I wanted to hear others opinions on it. I feel your opinion and my own aren't enough to go off of. :^)