Board Thread:Apply For Staff/@comment-28588026-20160721234308/@comment-9026519-20160725092954

Deepihanoa wrote: Flutterbutter wrote: Deepihanoa wrote: Flutterbutter wrote: I think I'm going to oppose this (not confirmed). While rollback is more basic of a job, I do feel it is a staff position and that it is one that many people quickly leave to move up the ranks. You are fit for the position, much more than others which is why my decision is not confirmed. I can say, at most, I will go neutral on this if I do change. why do you always oppose?

anyway

support~ I oppose because I feel there are still more qualified people for each position or, if not, there are people who will eventually join who will be. I also think that filling up all staff positions, especially as of now as the wiki recovers from what happened quite recently, is trying to push us forward much too fast and setting us up for a similar failure. K.....

still that hurts to llama Ik it hurts, but when it comes to forums that are supposed to be taken seriously and can affect the wiki both positively and/or negatively, I feel it needsa to be taken seriously and sometimes rough and hard choices need to be made. I always try to stick w/ honesty is the best policy and therefore try to be fair w/ my vote. The way I vote also doesn't mean I think badly of a person, it just means I don't think they should be in a certain position.