Board Thread:Apply For Staff/@comment-25714190-20170303225832/@comment-27913758-20170304164334

KuuderessioPlusvalín wrote:

If dradoner is always saying oppose to a thread, that has several consequences. A oppose is a negative vote that eliminates a positive vote. If IS a user that you didn´t know, why do you always vote "oppose"? In any case vote neutral, if you didn´t know if the user will be a good moderator, but you ALWAYS vote oppose. And those users that you vote "oppose" don´t have nothing against you. That is very selfish! For that reason, I am opposed to the Dradoner´s idea because this user has always voted "oppose" in all threads. .Don´t expect to recieve supports if you always say "oppose" to all the threads. That is called "karma" Honestly, that's one of the shittiest reasons in the book to oppose someone's application thread. Anyone can oppose whoever they fucking please, no need to oppose them for stating their opinion on someone's thread. Drad likely had their reasons for opposing but didn't feel like stating why they opposed a thread. Also, about the "uwu Drad always opposes" thing, that's incorrect; there are several threads Drad has supported. I would link them, but I'm a lazy shit and don't really feel like going through several threads just to find 3-5 threads they supported. Plus, opposing a thread wouldn't make someone a shitty staff member, it actually would make them a better one due it both giving them a filter to be able to decide what would be a shit suggestion/person applying for staff and what would be a decent suggestion/person applying for a staff position and it also shows that they can voice their opinion without the fear/worry of someone criticizing them for it, which shows some maturity, something a lot of people here lack.