Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-30280189-20170910005027/@comment-30280189-20170910015430

CrystaltheCool wrote: HEY YOU DO REALIZE THAT HEAD ADMIN AS A CONCEPT ISN'T REAL RIGHT?

'''THERE IS NO HEAD ADMIN. THAT IS A SOCIAL CONSTRUCT FROM THE BOOG ERA WHICH FOR SOME DUMBASS REASON PEOPLE STILL HAVE IN THEIR HEADS.'''

'''METHINKS THE BUREAUCRAT LABELS WEREN'T UPDATED TO SAY "BUREAUCRAT" INSTEAD OF "HEAD ADMIN". SOMEONE SHOULD GET ON THAT.'''

EITHER WAY, I'M GOING TO OPPOSE RIGHT AWAY BECAUSE OF THAT HUGE CRITICAL RESEARCH FAILURE.

Lmao, what research failure? every single thing on the thread is valid and can easily be backed up. However it's understandable you'd be so damn salty as always, lol,,