Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-30392919-20170215043154/@comment-30840516-20170215205136

Redandsymmetry wrote: Mr.Rankings11 wrote: Oppose, as the wiki definition of spam does not mention pages, also,  comedy is subjective, and if you don't like it or you suspect it to be a spam page, then don't click on  also were will we draw the line between spam and joke? You're seriously just trying to defend your stupid "OCs" when you know how stupid they are. Also, support. Wow, I didn't think you were that kind of person to get all salty over joke OCs. Leave this person alone. They should be able to cast whichever vote they wish without someone bullying them like that.

Speaking of which, this thread seems to honestly be targeted towards Mr.Rankings11. I'm really disappointed. This happened before, with Legend, who created joke OCs that he liked and he got harassed and bullied about it. Bullying is against the rules, and making a thread clearly targeting one specific user is bullying.

I've also decided that I change my vote to Oppose until it is defined exactly what a spam page is.

If a rule states that "cringey, gibberish, non-funny, crap" should be deleted, I can delete whatever I think fits that category. I can delete Social-chan if I wanted, if that was my definition of cringy gibberish non-funny crap.

I would be okay with adding a rule about not posting pages with hardly anything on it, like the example, but I would be able to delete everything in. And I would.

I'd also be okay with adding a rule about page content. Like the example, pages with only gibberish and keysmashes would be deleted. If my Quality Standards suggestion passes, we could add these to them.