Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-24947676-20160530142615

This is going to be hard to explain.

So, if you read the Rules, you'll notice that there's nothing that says you have to make a suggestion if you want something changed. So, basically, you can change whatever you want AND you'll probably do it with a 100% chance of success since this type of thing isn't monitored.

So, what does this mean, you ask? It means that as long as someone doesn't make a suggestion for a major change to something, they can make the change with a very low chance of getting caught.

The lack of any rule against this makes it easily exploitable by all users, including myself. Hell, I exploited the lack of such a rule to give our methods of organization a huge overhaul, and I got away with it scot free!

Now that I think about it, that's not a good example since I did that to benefit the burning of everyone's eyes due to the messy page, but it's the first example I could think of.

Now, I haven't found a case of anyone exploiting this out of malicious intent or their own gain... Yet.

Hell, since I pointed it out, the lack of a rule about this heavily increases the chances of exploitation.

So, by now, what I'm suggesting is obvious. We should have a rule saying that if you want to make a major change to something on the wiki, you have to make a suggestion for it. 