Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-24947676-20161015155548/@comment-24947676-20161015163333

Demonic BB wrote: I think that they should at least get a warning. So oppose. They start with a warning, so they do get a warning at the first offense.

Xenpai wrote: I only approve of point one so opppppose. How is it a warning if there's no consequences for repeating the thing that resulted in the warning? Warnings work like this:


 * Dumbass: *breaks rule*
 * Staff Member: I'm warnin' ya, if you do that two more times, you'll get temporarily banned.
 * Dumbass: *continues to break rule, gets another warning, breaks rule again*
 * Staff Member: *temporarily bans Dumbass*

However, if there are no consequences after warnings, then what's the point of them? Here's how it would play out.


 * Newbie: *ignores voting requirements and votes anyway*
 * Staff Member: I'm warnin' ya, you'll continue to get warnings if you keep doin' that.
 * Newbie: *continues ignoring requirements*
 * Staff Member: *continues to give warnings that don't amount to any consequences*
 * The Scenario: *repeats until Newbie qualifies to vote, basically for a week*

Y'see how that can be a problem?