Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-9026519-20160310224347/@comment-9026519-20160311165149

LenLawliet wrote: Flutterbutter wrote: If an admin or mod (and in this case a mini-admin) aren't doing their job properly, that doesn't necissarily call for a demotion. However, when a staff member is a ring leader in a rebelious, rule breaking group, I feel action of some kind needs to be taken. I especially feel that action needs to be taken here as they've demoted and are now trying to ba a certain user for doing the same thing they're currently doing to him. If we're willing to demote long time admins for doing something of this level, why are wot willing to demote a mini-admin for doing the same? Simply because someone else did it first does not mean that they're in the right, especially when they hold a position of responsibility on this site. If we allow a staff member special privelges, what kind of example does this set for regular users who look at admins actions to determine their own? If you want to talk to me, do it on chat, not here please.

What?