Board Thread:Apply For Staff/@comment-24947676-20151230125713/@comment-2248043-20151230213551

Oppose.

You seem to accept the fact that you're prone to corruption. I know corrupt people and they're much better than that. I knew one person who was corrupt for a decade and they got better.

We also have three admins and a bureaucrat. Horizon, Jac, and Igor are here. If anything happens to them we fix them instead of hiring new people. Horizon's pretty active, Jac was only away for a little while (and probably for his own reasons), Igor is okay, and Jack already had his computer fixed.

Also, you call the rollback position useless and you say that major things won't be done until the positions are filled. rollback positions won't do much since they're useless (and I never see real use of a rollback here), so I still oppose.

I don't believe there's been a lot of edit wars here, and I check the Wiki Activity a bit more now. I haven't heard about any on the forums, on people's message walls, etc. Rollbacks are so useless we probably don't even need it. Like you said, the "Wikia literally just considers them normal users with one extra ability." I don't think the Wikia needs one if rollbacks are just that.

If the pages are really bad so that we need a rollback, then let's just make the other users more active and helpful on those pages. I've never had rollback ever and I've been doing just fine with editing. It's really easy if we all learn to work together.