Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-9026519-20160529104548

Basically this rule would require a forum to have enough substance to make exactly what it's doing (prohibiting, allowing, ect.) clear as day. It has to give a universal definition to what it is outlining so staff can follow it. This prevents bias from getting someone banned and prevents things like witch hunts from occurring on this wiki. A prime example of where this rule would come into play can be found here(specifically lines like "No more meanness in general.").

If enough people (8) agree that it does not have enough content and provide what is inadequate, then the forum will be closed and the poster will recieve a message on their wall informing them of it's closure. However, if the person (or someone else) chooses to rewrite said forum and fill in the missing content (as a reason you feel it doesn't meet the content requirements is needed by the 8 people for it to be closed), it can be reopened.

This rule will prevent rules that can be abused from even being allowed to pass and can stop forums that would negatively affect this wiki from winning because of biased opinions. 