Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-24947676-20170730013733/@comment-24947676-20170801205527

PISTACHIOLORD wrote: Okay i finally have time to write. So, as I stated earlier, I 'oppose. '

Number 1(I'm a girl in a world in which my only job is to marry rich my father has no sons so im the one-cough)  Not all pastel colors fuck up your eye sight and make it hard for you to see. Some colors such as pastel purple would work fine with the new theme as the print is now white not black. Some colors might not work and that can be edited.

Number 2(Hes after me cause im a schuyler sister that elevates his status id help to be naive to set that aside maybe that is why i introduce him to eliza-chokes) It seems for some reason you showed very old ocs of people who haven't edited their pages in ages and also people who haven't been on the wiki in months like third-impact-is-coming. They probably would have changed it if they were active. As for Fun's oc, it's very hard to go on every single oc you own and just change all the colors and test out new ones so it matchs the new color scheme. That might be why he hasn't edited that certain page yet. I feel this one is offtopic.

Number 3(I know my sister like i know my own mind you will never find any one as trusting or as kind, dies) Couldn't you simply adjust the brightness of the device you are currently using for a single page? It's not very hard on most devices and can be redone in a matter of seconds.

Number4. As Legend stated, by not letting users choose a color of their choice for the infobox is like taking away apart of the users freedom. This wiki is for creativty and maybe someones favorite color is pastel green and they want to add it to their info-box?

Number 5. Say a new user comes to the wiki and uses an info-box and adds a pastel color and than GETS A GODDAMN WARNING. I understand that you may say "but pisstaco they should have read the r00lz like a good user!!!1!" May I remind you that barely anyone goes to check the rules page when they first join this wiki. I honestly didn't until later on while clicking on the random page button.

'Number 6''. '''And if you say add it to the quality standards because I didn't read it correctly the first time, would that mean if a shitty new user LightningMcENDMe were to make a page, and say an admin like our holy Rena and Porcy were to add the needs help category to the page, the user would be completly confused. Last time I checked, when your page doesn't meet the quality standards no one says anyhting or gives you a message about it unless they are one of those kind of users who have to state teh obvious and say "lol ur page no meat quality goodnss"

Number 7. Im not really sure but I'm pretty sure before you edited the thread it said something about epipsy being caused by bright colors and such?? It's removed now but I'd still like to bring it up. Seizures are not caused by simply seeing bright lights. That's not exactly how it works at all. It's when a series of flashing lights happen suddenly or abruptly that usually cause seizures in epileptic people.

Number 8. Instead of fucking banning neon and very bright colors for infoboxes, why not change the goddamn theme? There was a theme vote which I'm pretty sure has been up for like 2 weeks and no one has seemed to changed it to the winning theme which is NOT this one. Changing the goddamn theme is much easier than changing every single pastel and bright colored info box out there.

'Number 9. 'It's too goddamn hard to change all the info boxes that oyu have already made in a certain color to fit these expectations. Say if you have 30 ocs and you used the same bright colors for every info box, now you get to go ahead and go fix them because you don't want the goddamn needs help category on your page.

'Um..Yeah so I oppose. Lol k bye' 1. the new OP isnt about eyesight tho?? the new OP is now about readability. so your first point is uh, Not Relevant

2. the examples listed were from clicking random page twenty times...

3. lowering the brightness doesnt make it readable tho?? it makes it less straining on the eyes, sure, but that doesnt make it readable.

4. i dont think we should be so free that we allow completely unreadable infoboxes... i highly doubt this one addition to the quality standards would turn this wiki into a dictatorship, lol ur paranoid.

5. people NEVER get warnings from not complying with the quality standards tho... ive never seen it happen so i assume it doesnt. when the quality standards arent met, the page is usually edited by staff to comply with the quality standards - in this case, the shade of green would be edited to one that is readable.

6. for something that minor (if thats the only issue and everything else complies), im pretty sure the minor thing is fixed by staff and the category isnt added. and if the "i confus what dos needs halp men??" is so common, well, mandatory explanations would have to be its own suggestion.

7. the epilepsy part?? was?? hyperbole?? have people forgotten what hyperbole is

8. maybe it wasnt changed because everyone forgot... could you link it?? because the winning theme either has light text or dark text, and if the real winning theme has light text then the problem remains - many infoboxes have become unreadable, and so their colors need to be changed.

9. thats just laziness, m8.