Thread:Markmossing/@comment-24651308-20160731175912/@comment-9026519-20160801173644

Shin HUGaku wrote: Flutterbutter wrote: Shin HUGaku wrote: Flutterbutter wrote: From what I've seen, you do get away w/ quite a bit Mark. You break our no spam rule almost daily and rarely, if ever receive any punishment for it what so ever. I took this just today. Yes, sometimes you're treated poorly by other users, but don't go saying they get away w/ more than you do. Well in his defense, that screenshot isnt even bad, he's having a little fun. For starters, this is just an example. And the rules are rules. Whether you're having fun or not, there are limits to what you can and cannot do.

Another example of this would be if someone had fun posting porn on the chat. That's their, and some others, form of fun, but it's not allowed therefore they will be warned and/or kicked/banned.

I don't see how the "no spam" rule is any different nor do I see any reason we should make exceptions for one rule and not another. If Mark truly doesn't want there to be any "people getting special treatment" then we should enforce all our rules equally, should we not? Yet it wasn't spam, was it unnecessarily repetitive? No. If we look @ what our rules say, "repeating the same words/phrases repeatedly". Therefore, I do believe that this example is spam and could be given a warning and/or kick for it. I have also said this was an example and is, compared to other times w/ Mark, minor. I'll also inform you that there have been people in the past who have been kicked/warned for posting similar things in similar amounts therefore, I feel, just as mark says, there should be no exceptions. Now, I'm not saying we ban and/or punish Mark for his past ofenses, but instead we drop this argument, leave this as it is, as it is simply a warning and enforce our rules as they should be in the future. :^) No exceptions. Just like Mark said, we need to stop "people [from] getting special treatment and not getting in trouble". :^)