Board Thread:Suggestions/@comment-24947676-20160710192528/@comment-24947676-20160710194214

Igor the Mii wrote: CrystaltheCool wrote:

Igor the Mii wrote: Oppose: We only need 1 BCrat admin, not every admin bcrat True, we only necessarily need one.

However, having one BCrat can be inconvenient for a few reasons:
 * The one BCrat might end up getting inconvenienced by something, like how our previous BCrat had computer issues. Or, they might have to go to a place with no internet. This is annoying if you recall that there's usually a staff application going on at least once a month.
 * The one BCrat isn't awake 24/7.
 * TIME ZONES. FUCKING TIME ZONES.

However, it's understandable why you might oppose for different reasons. Maybe you don't think the admins are trustworthy or something. Maybe you have bias against having multiple BCrats.

However, many wikis do have multiple BCrats, all of which are admins, so I think it might be a good idea to do the same. Not only i oppose that we need only one bureaucrat:

1.It makes the demotion thing complete hell if an admin refuses to demote him/herself if it passes

2.A bureaucrat could abuse it's powers and promote a lot of people into b-crats

3.This suggestion might backfire

4.I don't like the idea of having all admins as bureaucrat All of these reasons are reasonable. However, I have counter-arguments for all of them.

1. Someone will notice an admin being corrupt, make a demotion thread, and if that thread passes, someone will contact wikia and they'll demote the BCrat.

2. Read 1.

3. Read 1.

4. If you're uncomfortable with the idea, that's understandable. However, all of these admins are shown to be trustworthy, so unless your Len, IMO, there's not much of a reason to be uncomfortable with the ideas. On a lot of wikis, this is the norm.